In Defence of Liberty

Driven by data; ridden with liberty.

The Rise of Symbolic Taxes

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls has announced that a Labour government will reinstate the 50% tax rate on incomes over £150,000. In a speech to the Fabian Society conference, Ed Balls also called for a 10% starting rate of tax. However, what income bands this lower rate would apply to was not stated. This proposal concerns political symbolism, rather than raising tax revenues, as suggested by the jubilations of Labour activists.

(Video: The Telegraph)

The symbolic importance of the 50p rate was recognised by Universities Minister David Willetts. Chancellor George Osborne said: “It is very important that people see that when times are tough, we are, as they say, all in its together”. Prime Minister David Cameron has sought a small amount of tax relief for married couples, which the Institute for Fiscal Studies has decried as “symbolic”. In France, President François Hollande introduced a 75% levy on salaries of over €1m. President Hollande called the new tax “symbolic”, and designed to project political messages about fairness. A British financial transactions tax, often labelled the Robin Hood Tax, is being demanded to demonstrate the contrition of financial services.

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls have said the Conservatives have only offered "tax cuts for the rich". (Photo: Telegraph)

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls have said the Conservatives have only offered “tax cuts for the rich”. (Photo: Telegraph)

Assuring the Other Geese

The British 50% income tax rate certainly collected much less than anticipated. The 2012 HMRC analysis concluded “the underlying yield from the additional rate is much lower than originally forecast (yielding around £1bn or less), and that it is quite possible that it could be negative”. Furthermore, “the negative impact on GDP may increase over time, and therefore the direct yield (and revenues from other tax bases) might fall over time toward or beyond zero.” According to HMRC projections, the tax liability of additional rate taxpayers was £34.5bn in 2010-11, £41.3bn in 2011-12 and £41.6bn in 2012-13. These three years were under the 50% tax rate. Under the first year of the new additional rate of 45%, that liability rose to £49.3bn. This lower liability in 2010-11 reflects forestalling and other behavioural effects.

Instead of seeking to maximise revenues whilst minimising deadweight losses in economic activity, some taxes are levied to highlight political priorities, to garner popularity, and to extract penance over monies. John Baptiste Colbert famously said: “The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing.” The art of symbolic taxation is to make one goose hiss very loudly to assure the other geese you’re on their side.


4 comments on “The Rise of Symbolic Taxes

  1. Hadleigh Roberts
    January 28, 2014

    The key question behind the 50p tax idea is whether it helps to shift the deficit reduction argument away from economic competence to economic fairness. This is key for Labour and anybody else who thinks the Government is there to ‘improve’ rather than just to ‘manage’ the economy.

    On another point, if big business is so adept at avoiding the 50p rate, why is it moaning so much at the prospect of having to pay it?

    • Anthony Masters
      January 28, 2014

      I agree with that political assessment, but that was precisely my point: the 50p rate exists as a symbol that Labour are about “economic fairness”.

      I would point out that the 50p tax rate would be the rate on marginal individual income above £150,000, rather than a form of corporate taxation. Thus, it cannot be said “big business” avoids the tax. The response from business leaders also appears to be about symbolism.

      • Hadleigh Roberts
        January 28, 2014

        I think it would be far better to concentrate taxation on property, which is much more difficult to hide in tax havens.

      • Anthony Masters
        January 28, 2014

        I’m trying to find the report being referenced in the following ASI article (the link goes somewhere else):

        Basically, we should focus levying taxes where those taxes have a low dead-weight cost — that is, a low amount of economic activity did not take place due to the tax — and avoid taxes with a high dead-weight cost. The article states that repeated taxes on property are efficient in that way, so property taxes and land value taxes have the lowest dead-weight costs.

Comments are closed.


This entry was posted on January 27, 2014 by in National Politics and tagged , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: